|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready... |
中文下载
HT William Gross (onthewing) – modernized and annotated
致谢威廉·格罗斯（飞翔者）——现代化和注释
Excerpts from Turretin’s Elenctic Theology (originally published 1679-1685)
摘录自图雷丁的《辩驳神学》（最初出版于1679-1685年）
This eBook been reformatted for readability, and all Greek and Hebrew words have been transliterated – the Strong’s numbers have been included.
这本电子书已重新格式化以便阅读，所有希腊文和希伯来文词汇都已音译——并包含了斯特朗编号。
This one has a biographical sketch of the translator as well as the author.
本书包含了译者和作者的传记简介。
An original version of this book which is neither reformatted nor modernized can be found here.
本书既未重新格式化也未现代化的原始版本可以在这里找到。
The discussion contained in the following pages is a part of a much larger volume originally published in Philadelphia in the year 1817, with the title: “A Historical Sketch of Opinions on the Atonement, interspersed with Biographical Notices of the leading Doctors, and Outlines of the Sections of the Church, from the Incarnation of Christ unto the present Time: with Translations from Francis Turretin on the Atonement,” by James R. Willson.
以下页面所包含的讨论是一部更大卷帙的一部分，该书最初于1817年在费城出版，标题为：”赎罪观点的历史概述，穿插主要博士的传记通告，以及从基督道成肉身到现今教会各派的纲要：附弗朗西斯·图雷丁关于赎罪的翻译”，作者詹姆斯·威尔逊。
The volume was dedicated to the Rev. Dr. Alexander McLeod.
该卷献给亚历山大·麦克劳德牧师博士。
Its nature is well described in the title.
其性质在标题中得到了很好的描述。
The author traced the varying progress and development of opinion on the atonement, from the beginning of the era down to his own immediate contemporaries.
作者追溯了关于赎罪观点的不同进程和发展，从那个时代的开始直到他自己的同时代人。
While scrupulously careful to represent all with impartiality, he made no pretence of “dealing gently with errorists.”
虽然他一丝不苟地谨慎公正地代表所有人，但他并不假装”温和地对待错谬者”。
On the contrary, he aimed to “speak out with boldness and candour,” and at times even with “severity.”
相反，他旨在”大胆坦率地说出来”，有时甚至带着”严厉”。
His work, extending over so large a field, could of course be nothing more than a comprehensive outline or summary of its subject.
他的作品，延伸到如此广阔的领域，当然只能是对其主题的全面纲要或摘要。
After subserving a useful purpose in the conflicts of the former part of this century, it seems to have fallen into comparative oblivion, and has been for many years out of print.
在本世纪前半部分的冲突中发挥了有用的作用之后，它似乎已相对被遗忘，并且多年来一直绝版。
The latter portion of the volume, being the translation which is here reproduced, contained the matter, which is found under Questions 10–14, in Locus Decimus Quartus (De Officio Christi Mediatorio) of the Institutio Theologiæ Elencticæ of Francis Turretin, with the insertion in one instance of a short extract from another portion of the same work.
该卷的后半部分，即在此重印的译文，包含了弗朗西斯·图雷丁《辩驳神学教程》第十四部分（论基督中保的职分）中问题10-14下的内容，并在一处插入了同一作品另一部分的简短摘录。
This part of Dr. Willson’s work is apparently as much called for now as it was originally.
威尔逊博士的这部分作品显然现在和最初一样需要。
The various questions relating to the atonement are still discussed with frequency and earnestness.
与赎罪有关的各种问题仍然被频繁而认真地讨论。
The constant faith of the Church on the subject continues to be firmly held by the general body of the Reformed; but it is exposed to incessant attacks in every generation, generally from without, but sometimes from within, the pale of orthodox communions.
教会在这个主题上的恒久信仰继续被改革宗的普遍团体坚定持守；但它在每一代都暴露于不断的攻击之下，通常来自外部，但有时也来自正统教会范围之内。
And while contemporary authorship has furnished some admirable presentations of the common faith on this important point, it is doubted whether any other work of the same compass presents so clearly and forcibly the truth of God as to the Nature, Truth, Perfection, Matter, and Extent of the Satisfaction made by the blessed Saviour.
虽然当代作者在这个重要问题上对共同信仰提供了一些令人钦佩的陈述，但令人怀疑是否有任何其他同等范围的作品如此清晰有力地呈现神的真理，关于蒙福救主所作补赎的性质、真实性、完全性、内容和范围。
The lucid arrangement of topics, compact argumentation, fairness of statement, and constant appeal to the law and the testimony, leave the careful reader little to desire.
主题的清晰安排、紧凑的论证、陈述的公正，以及对律法和见证的持续诉求，使仔细的读者几乎没有什么可挑剔的。
The translation as issued by Dr. Willson was in the main faithful and accurate.
威尔逊博士发行的译文总体上是忠实和准确的。
In some cases, however, the learned divine, by an oversight, failed to express the exact sense of his author; while in many more the carelessness of the proof-reader did him great injustice.
然而，在某些情况下，这位博学的神学家由于疏忽，未能表达作者的确切意思；而在更多情况下，校对者的粗心对他造成了极大的不公。
Pains have been taken to collate the version line by line with the original, so as to amend any inaccuracies.
我们费心逐行将译本与原文对照，以修正任何不准确之处。
Nothing is claimed on the score of rhetorical finish or the niceties of verbal expression, but the work as now published is believed to present in simple and perspicuous English the exact line of thought and argument presented by the great Genevan professor.
在修辞润色或言辞表达的精妙方面不作任何声称，但现在出版的作品被认为用简单明晰的英文呈现了这位伟大的日内瓦教授所提出的确切思路和论证。
It only remains to be added, that while the Board of Publication approves of the work as a whole, it is not to be considered responsible for every shade of opinion on minute points, or every interpretation of quoted Scripture.
只需补充的是，虽然出版委员会整体上认可这部作品，但不应被视为对每个细节上的意见差异或所引用经文的每个解释负责。
The biographical sketch of Turretin is a condensation of an article in the twentieth volume of the “Princeton Review.”
图雷丁的传记简介是《普林斯顿评论》第二十卷中一篇文章的浓缩。
Table of Contents
目录
Preface
序言
Biographical Sketch of the Author, Francis Turretin
作者弗朗西斯·图雷丁的传记简介
1 The Necessity of the Atonement
1 赎罪的必要性
2 The Truth of the Atonement
2 赎罪的真实性
3 The Perfection of the Atonement
3 赎罪的完全性
4 The Matter of the Atonement
4 赎罪的内容
5 The Extent of the Atonement
5 赎罪的范围