Getting your Trinity Audio player ready... |
IN 1798 a volume was published in Edinburgh under the title, “The lord’s Supper fully Considered, in a Review of the History of its Institution; with Meditations and Ejaculations suited to the several parts of the Ordinance: to which are prefixed Three Discourses delivered at the Lord’s Table; by the late Rev. John Owen, D.D.”
1798年,爱丁堡出版了一卷书,书名为《主餐的全面考量,对其设立历史的回顾;附有适合圣礼各部分的默想和祷告:前面加上已故约翰·欧文博士牧师在主餐桌前所作的三篇讲道》。
中文下载

It needs but a glance at the three discourses in order to feel assured, from internal evidence, that they belong to Owen.
只需瞥一眼这三篇讲道,就能从内在证据确信它们属于欧文。
The rest of the volume is assuredly not Owen’s, as it consists of “Remarks on the ‘Plain Account,’ ” etc.,—a work published long after onr author’s death.
该卷的其余部分确定不是欧文的,因为它包含”对《简明叙述》的评论”等——这是在我们的作者死后很久才出版的作品。
These remarks are directed against a treatise of the celebrated Hoadly, bishop of Bangor, and latterly of Winchester.
这些评论是针对著名的霍德利的论文,他是班戈主教,后来是温彻斯特主教。
His treatise bears the title, “A Plain Account of the Nature and End of the Lord’s Supper,” and was published in 1735.
他的论文题为《主餐的性质和目的的简明叙述》,于1735年出版。
An answer to it was published by Thomas Brett, LL.D., an English divine and controversialist; but whether his answer is identical with the “Remarks,” we have failed to ascertain.
托马斯·布雷特法学博士,一位英国神学家和论战家,对此发表了答辩;但他的答辩是否与”评论”相同,我们未能确定。
The three discourses subjoined are not of much importance, but as they have already appeared in print, we include them in this edition.—ED.
附加的三篇讲道不是很重要,但既然它们已经印刷出版,我们将其包含在此版本中。——编者
Table of Contents
目录
Prefatory Note
序言
Discourse I
讲道一
Discourse II
讲道二
Discourse III
讲道三
For an in-depth treatment of this topic see Sacramental Discourses: 25 Sermons in Preparation of Communion (eBook) by John Owen
关于此主题的深入论述,请参见约翰·欧文的《圣礼讲道:为圣餐预备的25篇讲道》(电子书)