|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready... |
Steve Hays’ “Apologetics” is an insightful and practical guide to Christian apologetics, offering a wealth of wisdom drawn from years of experience in the field.
史蒂夫·海斯的《护教学》是基督教护教学的富有洞察力和实用性的指南，提供从多年该领域经验中汲取的丰富智慧。
Hays addresses the challenges and strategies of defending the faith in a way that is both accessible and deeply thoughtful.
海斯以既易懂又深思的方式论述为信仰辩护的挑战和策略。
中文下载
He emphasizes the importance of understanding the various types of people one might encounter in apologetic discussions, from those with unwavering hobbyhorses to skeptics who constantly move the goalposts.
他强调理解人们在护教讨论中可能遇到的各种类型人的重要性，从那些有固执己见者到不断移动目标的怀疑论者。
Hays provides valuable advice on how to engage with these different individuals effectively, highlighting the necessity of prioritizing one’s own apologetic goals and not getting sidetracked by every challenge.
海斯提供如何有效与这些不同个体接触的宝贵建议，强调优先考虑自己的护教目标而不被每个挑战分心的必要性。
One of the most compelling aspects of the book is Hays’ focus on the nature of rational dialogue and the limits of argumentation.
这本书最引人注目的方面之一是海斯对理性对话本质和论证限制的关注。
He argues that while Christians have a duty to present their reasons for belief and respond to objections, they are not responsible for convincing every skeptic they encounter.
他论证虽然基督徒有义务陈述他们信仰的理由并回应反对意见，但他们没有责任说服他们遇到的每一个怀疑论者。
This perspective can be both liberating and empowering for apologists, as it places the onus of belief on the individual while encouraging apologists to present their case with clarity and conviction.
这种观点对护教者既可以是解放性的也可以是赋权的，因为它将信仰的责任放在个人身上，同时鼓励护教者以清晰和确信来陈述他们的论证。
Hays also explores the psychological and sociological dynamics of apologetic encounters, offering insights into why some individuals are resistant to persuasion and how to navigate these conversations with wisdom and patience.
海斯也探索护教遭遇的心理和社会动力，提供对为什么一些个体抗拒说服以及如何以智慧和耐心导航这些对话的洞察。
His discussion on the role of the Holy Spirit in illuminating truth and the importance of intellectual humility in apologetics adds a profound theological depth to the book.
他对圣灵在光照真理中的角色以及知识谦卑在护教学中的重要性的讨论为这本书增加了深刻的神学深度。
Overall, “Apologetics” by Steve Hays is a must-read for anyone interested in the rational defense of the Christian faith.
总体而言，史蒂夫·海斯的《护教学》对任何对基督教信仰理性辩护感兴趣的人来说都是必读之作。
Its blend of practical advice, theological reflection, and philosophical insight makes it an invaluable resource for both seasoned apologists and those new to the field.
它融合实用建议、神学反思和哲学洞察的特点使它成为经验丰富的护教者和该领域新手的宝贵资源。
The book’s emphasis on logic, persuasion, and the awe-inspiring nature of Christian truth will draw readers in and equip them to engage thoughtfully and effectively in the defense of their faith.
这本书对逻辑、说服和基督教真理令人敬畏本质的强调会吸引读者并装备他们深思且有效地参与为他们信仰的辩护。
TABLE OF CONTENTS
目录
Tips on apologetics
护教学要诀
“Thomistic Simplicism”
“多马主义简单论”
Retreating into pious nonsense
退缩到虔诚的胡言乱语
Parsons on presuppositionalism
帕森斯论预设主义
Frame’s presuppositionalism
弗雷姆的预设主义
Apologetic methodology revisited
护教方法论重访
An open question to presuppositionalists
给预设主义者的开放问题
What’s presuppositionalism?
什么是预设主义？
Knowledge and ignorance of God
对神的知识和无知
Blank slate historiography
白板史学
Is TAG viable?
先验论证可行吗？
Sye-Clones
赛氏克隆
Classical apologetics
古典护教学
Revelatory regress
启示倒退
The epistemological boat
认识论船只
The problem with TAG
先验论证的问题
Van Til on common ground
范泰尔论共同基础
Is 2+2=4 more certain than God’s existence?
2+2=4比神的存在更确定吗？
Strategic priorities in apologetics
护教学中的战略优先次序
“Ten Problems with Presuppositionalism”
“预设主义的十个问题”
Apologetic methodology revisited
护教方法论重访
McGrew on Van Til
麦格鲁论范泰尔
Four Views on Christianity and Philosophy
基督教与哲学的四种观点
Reviewing reviews of the Licona/Dillahunty debate
评论利科纳/迪拉汉蒂辩论的评论
If Christianity was proven false, would you believe?
如果基督教被证明是虚假的，你会相信吗？
Rationalists and mystery-mongers
理性主义者和神秘贩子
Bulkheads
舱壁
Am I a presuppositionalist?
我是预设主义者吗？
A response to Frame’s presuppositionalism
对弗雷姆预设主义的回应
Begging the question
循环论证
What would you become if…
如果…你会变成什么
Faith without a floor
没有底线的信心
Color-coded Bible
彩色编码圣经
The inner testimony of the Spirit
圣灵的内在见证
Knowing more than we can prove
知道超过我们能证明的
A priori inerrancy
先验无误论
Inerrancy and evidentialism
无误论与证据主义
Should a Christian debater bracket his beliefs?
基督教辩论者应该搁置他的信念吗？
Is it improper to argue evidentially for the Resurrection?
为复活进行证据论证是不当的吗？
Inerrancy and evidentialism
无误论与证据主义
Has presuppositionalism evolved?
预设主义演变了吗？
James Anderson on presuppositionalism
詹姆斯·安德森论预设主义
What is presuppositionalism getting at?
预设主义在追求什么？
Sorting out presuppositionalism
理清预设主义
Why I’m still a Christian
我为什么仍然是基督徒